Legal Opinion
United States v. Rubio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1983No. Nos. 80-1577, 80-1584, 80-1586, 80-1587, 80-1592 and 80-1631PublishedCited by 185 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
A majority of the panel in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the en banc suggestion. Judge Poole would grant rehearing and accept the en banc suggestion.
The opinion and dissent filed herein on April 14, 1983 are withdrawn and the attached Opinion on Denial of Petition for Rehearing and the Dissent are substituted therefor.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35(b).
The petition…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.