Legal Opinion

Rushing v. Tennessee Crime Commission

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The complainants Walter Bushing and Henry Light were summoned to testify before the Tennessee Crime Commission created by Chapter 13, Public Acts Third Extra Session, 1937. They challenged the authority of the Commission to subpoena them upon the ground that the Act is void and filed the bill seeking to have it declared unconstitutional. The chancellor sustained defendants’ demurrer and dismissed the bill. Appeal was prayed and the cause is here to review the decree of the chancellor upon assignments of error through wfiich it is insisted that the Act contravenes provisions of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re SimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. House v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Goetz v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Stewart v. StanleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Donathan v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ford Motor Company v. PaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API