Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Company v. Pace

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1960PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BurNett

The original bill in this cause was filed by the Ford Motor Company seeking declaratory judgment as to the validity of Chapter 79 of the Public Acts of 1955 (now codified as Sections 59-1701 through 59-1720, as this Chapter was amended by subsequent Acts), and if valid, construction of the Act. We take jurisdiction only on the proposition that the constitutionality of the statute “is the sole determinative question in the litigation”. (Sec. 16-408, T.C.A.). If this were not true, the jurisdiction of the case would be in the Court of Appeals.

The chancellor in a memorandum opinion, which is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Kuhl Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lazenby Ex Rel. Lazenby v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Tober Foreign Motors, Inc. v. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Louviere v. ByersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API