Legal Opinion

House v. Creveling

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 42 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Davidson County.— Hon. John R. Aust, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

The above-styled cases were consolidated by consent of the parties, and were heard together in the lower court and in this court.

The three suits were brought by state officials to enjoin interference with the possession of the offices they held. It was alleged tha the defendants were claiming to be entitled to exercise the function*, of the offices held by complainants by reason of the provisions of an act of the legislature known as House Bill No. 183, approved by the Governor January 31, 1923. It was averred that said act was unconstitutional and void. A temporary restraining order was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Woods v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bowman v. CockrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  5. State v. AlgoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1888

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. SenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Koen v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Donathan v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Board of Medical Examiners v. FriedmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API