Legal Opinion

Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. Ooms

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 15, 1946No. 9115PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants sued in the District Court under the provisions of § 4915, R.S., U.S. C.A. Title 35, § 63, to have it adjudged that the appellant, The Union Metal Manufacturing Company, is entitled to receive a patent containing claims 1 and 2 of application Serial No. 513,730. From a judgment holding that neither of the claims is patentable, they appeal.

Claims 1 and 2 of the application read as follows:

“1. A longitudinal compression member having equal strength in all lateral directions comprising two elongated frusto-conical tubes in substantially straight axial alignment throughout their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Morrison v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Ternstedt Mfg. Co. v. Motor Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re MageliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Rendleman v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
  4. National Machine Products Co. v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
  5. Dirzius v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API