Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. Ooms
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellants sued in the District Court under the provisions of § 4915, R.S., U.S. C.A. Title 35, § 63, to have it adjudged that the appellant, The Union Metal Manufacturing Company, is entitled to receive a patent containing claims 1 and 2 of application Serial No. 513,730. From a judgment holding that neither of the claims is patentable, they appeal.
Claims 1 and 2 of the application read as follows:
“1. A longitudinal compression member having equal strength in all lateral directions comprising two elongated frusto-conical tubes in substantially straight axial alignment throughout their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Morrison v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Ternstedt Mfg. Co. v. Motor Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re MageliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Rendleman v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
- National Machine Products Co. v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
- Dirzius v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.