Legal Opinion
Dirzius v. Ladd
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 19, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 2979-62Published
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, District Judge.
This civil action was instituted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145 seeking judgment authorizing the defendant, Commissioner of Patents, to issue Letters Patent of the United States on an application Serial No. 725,599 entitled “High Speed Drilling Attachment” filed April 1, 1958, by Bennie F. Dirzius, plaintiff.
The invention described in the application relates to an attachment adapted to be fastened to a conventional drill press, the attachment being designed to increase the speed of the drill and enable it to be used for making small round holes in a wide range of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blisscraft of Hollywood v. United Plastics Company, Marmax Products Corp., and Morris Shapiro, Doing Business as Great Eastern Housewares CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Levin v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946