Legal Opinion

Ternstedt Mfg. Co. v. Motor Products Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1941No. 8623PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, Ternstedt Manufacturing Company and General Motors Corporation, appeal from a judgment dismissing their bill of complaint against appellee, Motor *835Products Corporation, for alleged infringement of two patents, namely, the Wright reissue patent No. 18866, dated June 13, 1933, for window construction in the body of a closed vehicle, and Fisher patent No. 2048605, dated July 21, 1936, for closed car ventilation, appellant Ternstedt Manufacturing Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of appellant, General Motors Corporation, being owner of each patent by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Bullock Electric Mfg. Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  5. Roemer v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  2. Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Borden Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1952
  3. Owens v. Bell & Howell Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API