Legal Opinion
In re Mageli
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 18, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8799PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, ad*1381hered to on reconsideration, affirming the examiner’s rejection of the sole claim in appellants’ application, serial No. 536,-618, filed March 23, 1966, for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm.
The Subject Matter Claimed
The claim on appeal is for the compound “Di-secondary-butylperoxydicar-bonate,” which we shall refer to as SBP. The application teaches that this ester is useful as an initiator of polymerization reactions of olefinically unsaturated monomers such as styrene, vinyl chloride, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re PalmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- National Machine Products Co. v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Simmons Fastener Corporation v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Julie Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Guildline Instruments, Inc., and Hallmark Standards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.