Legal Opinion
Rendleman v. Ladd
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 2417-59PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIRICA, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought under 35 U.S.C. § 145 in which plaintiffs Norman Rendleman, as the applicant, and United Engineering and Foundry Company as the assignee of an application for patent entitled “Metal Rolling,” serial number 327,484, filed December 23, 1952, seek to have the Court authorize the issuance, to the assignee, of a patent containing claims 10, 11 and 14-18 (entered and examined in said application), and proposed claims 19-22 (which were not entered by the Examiner), not examined and not considered by the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Lucke v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joseph W. Newman v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Jozef Sikora v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Potter Instrument Co. v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969