Legal Opinion
Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 30, 2017No. 2016-2093PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s third administrative review of its antidumping-duty order covering certain steel nails from China. Mid Continent Nail Corporation, a domestic entity, asked Commerce to initiate the third administrative review to determine the proper duty rates for the covered period, but Mid Continent did not serve the request directly on Suntec Industries, a Chinese exporter and producer named in the antidumping order and in the request. As this case comes to us, it is undisputed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Intercargo Insurance Company F/k/a International Cargo & Surety Co., (Surety for M. Genauer) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS v. IANCUCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Solarworld Americas, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Al Ghurair Iron & Steel LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- New Mexico Garlic Growers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Elysium Tiles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.