Bernard v. Parmelee
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The court below, upon the application of the defendants, ordered a dismissal of this action upon the ground that the same had not, after its commencement, been prosecuted with reasonable diligence. The appeal is from said judgment of dismissal upon a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions contains the affidavits upon Which the defendants presented the motion to dismiss and the counter-affidavits filed by the plaintiff in resistance to the motion.
The action is one to quiet title to certain mining property situated in Placer county. The complaint was filed on the twenty-seventh day of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Quigley v. GillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ferris v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Black Bros. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. Kings County Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Witter v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Guernewood Park Resort & TavernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.