Legal Opinion
Vitkievicz v. Valverde
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 2012No. B229605PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Michael John Vitkievicz challenges an administrative decision by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) temporarily revoking his privilege to operate a motor vehicle. He appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of mandate after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. He contends the sustaining of the demurrer based on the statute of limitations was error because he timely filed his petition within 95 days after the mailing of notice of the final administrative decision, and the DMV waived the statute of limitations defense by failing to timely demur. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- City of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles Employee Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Dattani v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Garcia v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lindow v. Lindow CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.