Legal Opinion

Simmons v. BD. OF ADJ. OF CITY OF CHARLESTON

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 2, 1955No. 16955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Frank Eatmon, Acting Associate Justice.

The City of Charleston has had in effect for a number of years a zoning ordinance enacted pursuant to the general statutory law of the State. Between East Bay and Concord Streets, south of Broad Street, there is a large area of the city zoned as a “B” residential district. To the east of Concord Street is the waterfront of Cooper River, there being between the street and the river a small strip of land also included in this residential district. This was typical waterfront property with wharves still being used by small commercial vessels but no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Matter of Hickox v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Hodge v. POLLOCKSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rush v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Lovely v. Zoning Bd. of App. of City of Presque IsleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  4. Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Ex Parte La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API