Legal Opinion

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, LOCAL UNION NO. 3. v. Mid-Atlantic Promotions, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 2004PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, International Association of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local No. 3, asks us to determine whether Appellee, Michael Feight, is an “employer” under Pennsylvania’s Wage Payment and Collection Law (“WPCL”) at 43 P.S. §§ 260.1-260.12, and is therefore liable to Appellant for unpaid wages. We hold the trial court properly denied Appellant’s motion to remove the compulsory non-suit, because Appellant failed to produce sufficient evidence that Appellee qualified as an “employer” under the WPCL. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment entered in the Westmoreland…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. Sacred Heart HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Brinich v. JenckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Emge v. HagoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Mohney v. McClureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Hirsch v. EPL Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Bair v. PurcellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Scungio Borst v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Staiger, M. v. Holohan, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API