Legal Opinion
Scungio Borst v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 20, 2014No. 2493 EDA 2012PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BOWES, J.:
Scungio Borst & Associates (“SBA”) appeals following entry of judgment in its favor and against 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC (“410 SLD”) and Kenworth II, LLC (“Kenworth”), and challenges the September 30, 2010 order granting summary judgment in favor of Robert DeBolt, a principal in 410 SLD. The underlying action was commenced for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, fraud, and for a violation of the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (“CASPA”), 73 P.S. §§ 501-516. After thorough review, we affirm.
The pertinent facts are as follows. 410 SLD contracted in writing…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- LJL Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Sitkin's Junk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- McMahon v. McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Andrews v. Cross Atlantic Capital Partners, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- El-Gharbaoui, A. v. Ajayi, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Scungio Borst & Associates v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- BAUGUESS ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC. v. HOSPITALITY BUILDERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Burns Electrical Services v. Patel, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.