Legal Opinion

Emge v. Hagosky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1998PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted a compulsory nonsuit at the close of Appellant’s case. The court ruled that Appellant was unable to prove that he was a business invitee on the premises where he was injured because there was no proof of an invitation, and even if there was an invitation, Appellant exceeded the scope of the invitation. Thus, the court concluded Appellant had the status of a mere trespasser and was unable to prove a prima facie case of negligence. We reverse.

Appellant brought an action seeking to recover damages for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Poleri v. SalkindSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Crotty v. Eeading Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Brinich v. JenckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Campisi v. Acme Markets Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API