Legal Opinion

Pelton Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 9, 1960No. 63935; protest 58/14163 (San Francisco)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The merchandise under consideration consists of 100 womout :and obsolete print rollers, which were assessed with duty at 57 per centum ad 'valorem and $5 each under paragraph 395 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified 'by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement •on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T. D. 54108, which provides as follows:

(Print rollers, of whatever material composed, with raised _ _70/ . patterns of brass or brass and felt, finished or unfin- 'P c /o ished, used for printing, stamping or cutting designs. va ’

Plaintiffs contend…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Seeberger v. CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API