Legal Opinion

Cattaneo v. Cattaneo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 18, 1989No. 7044PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiff’s motion to clarify and denying the defendant’s motion to modify an earlier judgment of dissolution. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in considering and relying on mistaken facts and evidence outside the record in deciding both motions, (2) in denying the defendant’s motion to modify, and (3) in granting the plaintiff’s motion to clarify.

The marriage of the parties was dissolved by judgment of the court dated January 8, 1981. The parties stipulated to all matters concerning their five minor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Albrecht v. AlbrechtConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Arseniadis v. ArseniadisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Paddock v. PaddockConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Holcombe v. HolcombeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Ebach v. EbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API