Seaver v. Seaver
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment entering certain pendente lite orders in this dissolution case. The trial court issued a comprehensive and well reasoned memorandum of decision setting forth its factual findings in detail and applying the appropriate legal criteria. See Kaplan v. Kaplan, 8 Conn. App. 114, 116-18, 510 A.2d 1024 (1986). There is no requirement in the applicable statutes which makes it mandatory that a trial court consider the federal tax implications of its financial orders. The court’s judgment was not an abuse of its necessarily broad discretion. McPhee…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McPhee v. McPheeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Niles v. NilesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Jetmore v. JetmoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Kaplan v. KaplanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Rolla v. RollaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Hawkins v. HawkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010