F. E. Lykes & Co. v. Grove
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J".,
after stating the case: Can a plaintiff unite in the same complaint an action for the rescission of a contract and one for its breach? The decisions are to the effect that he may not, as this would be to deny and affirm the contract at the same time — “to blow hot and cold in the same breath.” The rights are opposed and the remedies are inconsistent. Machine Co. v. Owings, 140 N. C., 503, 53 S. E., 345; Davis v. Lumber Co., 132 N. C., 233, 43 S. E., 650; Fleming v. Congleton, 111 N. C., 186, 98 S. E., 449; Pritchard v. Williams, 175 N. C., 319, 95 S. E., 570; Power Co. v.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Moller v. . TuskaNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- McMahan v. McMahonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Warren v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Clausen v. HeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Griggs v. . GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.