Legal Opinion

Fields v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 23, 1912PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice, J., at May Term, 1912, of Moore. The facts are sufficiently stated in the'oj)inion of the Court bj Mr. Justice Walker.

1Opinion of the CourtWalKER, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover possession of- a bay mare mule, named Nell, which he exchanged with the defendant for a bay mare, and for damages for deceit and false warranty. It was alleged in tbe complaint tbat defendant Brown, wbo was tbe owner of tbe bay mare at tbe time of tbe exchange, falsely represented to plaintiff tbat tbe mare was sound, in good condition, and possessed of fine qualities, and, particularly, tbat sbe was (1) sound of body and limb in every particular; (2) was without defect in every respect; (3) tbat sbe would work anywhere sbe was bitched— to wagon, plow,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Cash Register Co. v. . TownsendSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Lunn v. . ShermerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Bullinger v. . MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. White Sewing MacHine Co. v. BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Schroeder v. ZykanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Hutchins v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. FurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API