Legal Opinion

Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1965No. 283PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

After the appeal was docketed in this Court the ap-pellees moved to dismiss it as moot on the ground that, following the entry of the order in question, Prudential was made a party to the action and entered a general appearance so that it will be bound by the final judgment, whether or not the notice of Us pendens was properly ordered and cancelled. The motion to dismiss is denied. The appeal did not become moot by Prudential’s becoming a party. If the notice of lis pendens was proper and remains in effect not only Prudential, but every other subsequent purchaser during the life of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Insurance Co. v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. McGurk v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Horney v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gilley v. ShoffnerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Cap Care Group, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API