Falco v. Institute of Living
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the psychiatrist-patient privilege *323against disclosure, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-MOe,1 is subject to any exceptions beyond those enacted by the legislature. We conclude that it is not and, therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s granting of the bill of discovery filed by the plaintiff, Joseph Falco, against the defendant psychiatric hospital, the Institute of Living, to compel disclosure of the name, last known address and social security number of one of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. TosteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. D'AmbrosioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. KemahSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. FaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.