Legal Opinion

State v. Fay

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 12, 2017No. SC19350PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

**744 In State v. Esposito , 192 Conn. 166 , 179-80, 471 A.2d 949 (1984), this court held that, in certain circumstances, the privileged psychiatric records of a witness testifying for the state are subject to in camera review by the trial court so that the court can determine whether the accused's constitutional right of confrontation entitles him to access to those records; if the witness refuses to authorize such review, the witness' testimony generally must be stricken. In the present case, the defendant, William Fay, was charged with murder and, following a jury trial, was convicted of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. State v. Samuel U.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
  5. Commissioner of Mental Health & Addiction Services v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API