Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Hawes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The plaintiff brought an action of tort in the Superior Court. Each defendant filed a demurrer and answer to the declaration. The plaintiff thereafter on November 3, 1937, filed a motion to strike from the files the demurrer and answer of the defendant Hawes, which were filed on January 20, 1937, on the ground that Rule 21 of the Superior Court (1932) had not been complied with. The motion also alleges, “Said pleadings were not signed, and, demurrer not verified.” The demurrers were sustained and the motion was denied. The plaintiff claimed a single appeal “from the decisions of the Court . .…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rice v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Richards v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Pollock v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Johnson v. East Boston Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Caverno v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fleming v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. DesLauries v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Neustadt v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Hite v. HiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Kerlinsky v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API