Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Johnson v. East Boston Savings Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1935PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for alleged illegal and improper conduct on the part of the individual defendants, committed in pursuance of an alleged conspiracy.

The plaintiff in his brief states that the purpose of the alleged conspiracy is set forth in the record and is “that on or about May 1,1929, the defendant corporation, through its officers and agents, and the said individual defendants . . . conspired together to injure and defame the plaintiff and deprive him of the reputation for integrity and faithful performance of his duties which had inured to him as a result of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Plant v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. City of Boston v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Loughery v. Central Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Willett v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fleming v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. DesLauries v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Comerford v. MeierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API