Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Dane

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 12, 1939PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

After the decision in Fleming v. Dane, 298 Mass. 216, the declaration wag amended in substantial respects, *47and the action is again here upon the plaintiff’s appeal from orders sustaining demurrers of all defendants.

Omitting words and sentences not directly bearing upon the essential allegations, the amended declaration may be restated as follows: For many years prior to 1934 the plaintiff owned a parcel of land in Brookline known as “Fleming Corner,” subject to a mortgage of $75,000 to the defendant Brookline Trust Company. Its value was greatly in excess of the amount of the mortgage, but…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Sandler v. SilkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. DesLauries v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Willett v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Jurgens v. AbrahamDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  5. Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API