Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hite v. Hite

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1938PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

These are two petitions filed in the Probate Court for the county of Middlesex by Fanny May Hite, the administratrix of the estate of her husband, Hugh M. Hite, late of Urbana, Ohio. The first petition is brought by virtue of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 190, § 1, to determine the value of specific personalty and real estate, alleged to be all the property left by the decedent in this Commonwealth and to be of a value less than $5,000. The second petition is based on G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 241, § 2, and seeks the partition and sale of the real estate mentioned in the first petition.

Both petitions were…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Brooks v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Lincoln v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Decatur v. Auditor of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Blumenthal v. BlumenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Donahue v. Dal, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. National Shawmut Bank v. CummingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Cohn v. CohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API