Legal Opinion

Rice v. Coolidge

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1876PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of tort. The principal question raised by the demurrer is, whether the plaintiff’s declarator *394states any legal cause of action. Each count alleges, in substance, that a proceeding for a divorce was pending in the courts of the State of Iowa, between Joseph S. Coolidge and Mary L. Coolidge, in which the latter alleged that the said Joseph S. Coolidge had been guilty of adultery with the plaintiff; that the defendants conspired together and with the said Mary L. Coolidge to procure and suborn witnesses to falsely testify in support of said charges of adultery; and that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. White v. . CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Smith v. HowardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. Bostwick v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1807

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Myers v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Mezullo v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API