Legal Opinion
Ful-Vue Sales Co. v. American Optical Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 1, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
By interrogatories 1, 2, 6, 11, 13, IS and 17 information is sought as to how many units embodying the invention of certain patents the defendant has manufactured, how many it has sold to specified companies and at what price, and how many units *186have been produced by a named licensee. They thus relate solely to the question of damages.
In substance the complaint alleges infringement and joint venture and seeks an injunction and accounting.
As to suits of this nature, Justice Cardozo, speaking for a unanimous Supreme Court, said in Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Smith v. BentleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- American Mfg. Co. v. ExermontDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Jerome v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Orgel v. Clark Boardman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Polaroid Corp. v. Commerce International Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957