Legal Opinion

Polaroid Corp. v. Commerce International Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 14, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

Defendant, National Film Service, Inc., makes this motion for (1) an order pursuant to Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. prohibiting plaintiff from examining into the subject of damages before defendant’s liability is established, and (2) an *395order under Rule 45(b) quashing a subpoena duces tecum issued by plaintiff in connection with the pretrial examination of the defendant.

The complaint alleges that the defendants herein were connected with certain parties against whom plaintiff obtained a judgment of infringement with respect to three…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alvin M. Marks v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Marks v. Polaroid CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Dictograph Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  5. Lyophile-Cryochem Corp. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Klauder v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API