Legal Opinion
Ponder v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 23, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-0425PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lathal Ponder, proceeding pro se, 1 brings this action against defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC (“Chase”), presenting various claims arising from a failed effort to modify Ponder’s mortgage, which Chase held, and the resulting foreclosure. Specifically, Ponder alleges that Chase breached two separate agreements to modify the mortgage, made material misrepresentations related to those agreements, negligently failed to prepare and deliver documents to him, and violated federal guidelines for foreclosure on homes financed through…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hood v. Satory Global, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Burnett v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Brewer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jessup v. Progressive FundingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.