Legal Opinion
Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 13, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0335PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Araya Henok brings this action against Chase Home Finance, LLC (“Chase”), Shapiro & Burson, LLP (“Shapiro”), and Fannie Mae challenging the legality of the foreclosure on a property he owned on Myrtle Avenue N.E. in Washington, D.C. (“the property”). After the defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings arguing that Henok’s complaint failed to satisfy the pleading requirements under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a claim for relief under Rule 12, Henok moved for partial summary judgment, for leave…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Henok Araya v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Xereas v. HeissDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.