Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Detroit Joint Board Amalgamated Clothing Workers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1950No. Calendar 44,534PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff, Herman Cohen, doing business as Lawndale Quality Cleaners, owns and operates a dry cleaning plant in the city of Detroit. He has 6 employees. Under the circumstances hereinafter noted, defendant, at the time of filing the bill of complaint and for some time prior thereto, had been maintaining a picket line in front of plaintiff’s place of business. Plaintiff, alleging that the picketing was unlawful, sought by his suit to have the picketing restrained. On the day the bill of complaint was filed the circuit judge issued an order to show case “why an injunction should not issue from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gates v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Silkworth v. Local No. 575 of the American Federation of LaborMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Niedzialek v. JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, HAIRDRESSERS AND COSMETOLOGISTS'INTERNATIONAL UNIONMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sunbeam Corp. v. Economy Distributing Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
  3. Michigan State Employees Ass'n v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Klee v. LightMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Midwest Properties Co. v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists & Proprietors International Union, Local 552Michigan Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API