Legal Opinion

Gates v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1908No. Docket No. 77PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Bay; Collins, J. Bill by Samuel G. M. Gates against the Detroit & Mackinac Railway Company for an injunction. From an order granting a preliminary injunction, and an order denying a motion to dissolve, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

The defendant has appealed from an order granting a preliminary injunction and the order of the court refusing to dissolve it. The injunction is mandatory in character, and reads as follows:

“ It is further ordered, and the court does hereby strictly command and enjoin the defendant, Detroit & Mackinac Railway Company, its counselors, attorneys, solicitors and agents, employés and servants, and each and every of them, particularly those of its officers and agents, employés and servants, who have charge and control of defendant’s yard in North Bay City, Bay county, Michigan, to place all cars…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
  2. Coe & Milsom v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
  3. Gates v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Van Buren Public School District v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Steggles v. National Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Niedzialek v. JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, HAIRDRESSERS AND COSMETOLOGISTS'INTERNATIONAL UNIONMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In Re Prichard EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Attorney General v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API