Niedzialek v. JOURNEYMEN BARBERS, HAIRDRESSERS AND COSMETOLOGISTS'INTERNATIONAL UNION
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Having first obtained leave of this Court, plaintiff has appealed from the circuit judge’s ruling denying a temporary injunction sought in plaintiff’s bill of complaint. Plaintiff claims that such refusal was an abuse of discretion and erroneous. On granting leave to appeal this Court issued a restraining order enjoining defendants from indulging in certain acts, including picketing of plaintiff’s place of business, pending our decision of this appeal. While the Metropolitan Barbers’ Association, Inc., a Michigan corporation, joined with John Niedzialek as plaintiff in this case, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gates v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Ideal Manufacturing Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Cohen v. Detroit Joint Board Amalgamated Clothing WorkersMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Midwest Properties Co. v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers, Cosmetologists & Proprietors International Union, Local 552Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Van Buren Public School District v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Citizens for Pre-Trial Justice v. GoldfarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.