Legal Opinion

Zeff, Farrington & Associates, Inc. v. Farrington

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 27, 1969No. 23464PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Hodges.

At issue here is the reasonableness of a covenant not to compete in an employment contract involving professional services. We refer to the parties as they appeared in trial court, where plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error was defendant.

Plaintiff employer sued to enjoin defendant employee from violating a covenant not to compete and for damages. Plaintiff is engaged in the business of soil engineering and employed defendant as a soil engineer. Plaintiff and defendant, who are licensed civil engineers, both being represented by counsel, entered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Barrows v. McMurtry Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. Whittenberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Mabray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Ditus v. BeahmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. DBA Enterprises, Inc. v. FindlayColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Nutting v. RAM Southwest, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
  3. Lessner Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. KidneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. HornerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Gibson v. AngrosColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API