Legal Opinion

Ditus v. Beahm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 1951No. 16467PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays

Prior to November 20, 1947, the parties to this action were partners in a business known as Burlington Livestock Sales Company, operating at Burlington, Colorado. On that date plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, entered into a written contract for the purchase of defendant’s interest in said business for a valuable consideration. The contract contained a provision that defendant would not “enter into any livestock pavilion business, either directly or indirectly, within a radius of fifty miles of Burlington, Colorado, within a period of fifty years from date.”

Defendant allegedly,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Whittenberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. Weber v. Nonpareil Baking Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dominion Video Satellite, Inc. v. EchoStar Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. American Television & Communications Corp. v. ManningColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. DBA Enterprises, Inc. v. FindlayColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Harrison v. AlbrightColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Zeff, Farrington & Associates, Inc. v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API