Legal Opinion

Whittenberg v. Williams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 8, 1943No. 15,048PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and are hereinafter designated as there.

Plaintiff, alleging that defendant had violated his contract not to compete with her in business, brought this action to restrain further violation, and for an accounting. The answer contained a demurrer for want of facts, specific admissions and a general denial, and alleged unreasonablenes of the contract and unfair treatment of plaintiff. Before trial a stipulation was filed limiting the issue to injunction or no injunction. Trial was to the court which found generally for plaintiff and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Barrows v. McMurtry Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. American Weekly, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  4. Jewel Tea Co. v. WatkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Axelson v. Columbine Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. West Shore Restaurant Corp. v. TurkSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. C. J. Goldammer, L. K. Goldammer, and C. Jack Goldammer, D.B.A. Dairy Queen of Colorado v. Ralph E. Fay and Ruth E. FayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Smithereen Co. v. RenfroeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  4. Management Recruiters of Boulder, Inc. v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Zeff, Farrington & Associates, Inc. v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API