James v. Cannell

— The respondent Cannell garnished certain funds of the appellant which were deposited to her credit in a Spokane bank. Shortly thereafter the garnishment was discharged upon the motion of the appellant because it had been wrongfully sued out. She then brought suit on the garnishment bond seeking to recover damages for loss of time and for labor ex pended in endeavoring to straighten ont her entanglement because of the tying up of her funds in the bank, and to recover certain sums which she had paid, or had become obligated to pay, to attorneys employed by her for the especial purpose of, and…