Legal Opinion
Wilbur v. Taylor
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1929No. 21939. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This is an action to recover upon a promissory note for the sum of $1,000, the execution of which was admitted. Special defenses were presented, and at the close of the defendants’ evidence, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount demanded. From a judgment on the directed verdict, the defendants have appealed.
It appears that, on December 1, 1924, the parties to this action entered into a written contract, which we here quote:
“Agreement
“This Agreement made and entered into this 1st day of December, A. D. 1924, by and between Carl E. Wilbur and Gertrude…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Madler v. SilverstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Wilkes v. BierneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Herberger v. Orr Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Myers v. RalstonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burns Trading Co. v. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Taylor v. WilburWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Benjamin Franklin Thrift Stores v. JaredWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Wilbur v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Hottel v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.