Legal Opinion

Coverdale v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 4, 1938No. 458PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

The question is whether a state statute imposing a privilege tax on the production of mechanical power contravenes the interstate commerce clause in so far as it is applied to an engine used to supply mechanical power to a compressor which increases the pressure of natural gas and thus.permits it to be transported to purchasers in other states.

Act No. 6- of the Regular Session of 1932 of the Louisiana Legislature, with certain qualifications and exceptions not material here, provides for a license tax to be paid by everyone engaged within the State in the business of manufacturing or…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Jones v. OpelikaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Ott v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. BeauchampSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API