Coverdale v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
The question is whether a state statute imposing a privilege tax on the production of mechanical power contravenes the interstate commerce clause in so far as it is applied to an engine used to supply mechanical power to a compressor which increases the pressure of natural gas and thus.permits it to be transported to purchasers in other states.
Act No. 6- of the Regular Session of 1932 of the Louisiana Legislature, with certain qualifications and exceptions not material here, provides for a license tax to be paid by everyone engaged within the State in the business of manufacturing or…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States Glue Co. v. Town of Oak CreekSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jones v. OpelikaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ott v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ford Motor Co. v. BeauchampSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.