Sturdza v. United Arab Emirates
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff Elena Sturdza has filed a pro se complaint against twenty-two defendants, most of whom she has not served. Before the court is the renewed motion to dismiss of David Shapiro and Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. [# 15]. Upon consideration of the motion, and this court’s sua sponte review of plaintiffs complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), the claims against defendants will be dismissed because the complaint fails to state a claim against them for which relief can be granted or because the claims…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Hedrick v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Fontaine v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- ['Mizell v. Suntrust Bank']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.