Legal Opinion
Fontaine v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 16, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1892PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Julie Elice Fontaine (“Plaintiff’ or “Fontaine”), proceeding pro se, has filed a complaint challenging the potential future foreclosure of property that she owns in Jacksonville, Florida. {See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Fontaine seeks an injunction to prevent two institutional defendants— JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) — and ten John Does (collectively, “Defendants”) from foreclosing on 4544 Deer Valley Drive (“the Property”) at some point in the future, and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Williams v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Taylor v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Woodyard v. HarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Nolan v. Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Azubuko v. Parking Officer No. 241District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.