Legal Opinion

Cassell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1926No. 3559PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court of Civil Appeals, speaking through Associate Justice Hall, gives us a very admirable statement of the nature and result of this suit, as follows:

"This was a suit to recover compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, for an alleged accident which occurred to Cassell, as an employee of the Wichita Theatre Company. The appellant Company defended upon the ground that the injuries complained of did not have to do with and originate in the business, trade or profession of the employer and were not received by Cassell while engaged in or about the furtherance of the affairs of his…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Texas Employers' Insurance v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Louie v. Bamboo GardensIdaho Supreme Court · 1947

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API