Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1970No. 7010SC71PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, J.

G.S. 113-292 provides in part as follows:

“(a) The Commission [State Wildlife Resources Commission] is authorized to authorize, license, regulate, prohibit, prescribe, or restrict all fishing in inland fishing waters, and the taking of inland game fish in coastal fishing waters, with respect to:(1). Time, place, character, or dimensions of any methods or equipment that may be employed in taking fish; )>

Regulation 1-68, subsection J, adopted by the Commission pursuant to the authority vested in it under the provisions of G.S. 113-292 provides: “It shall be unlawful to snag fish.” No definition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. PinyatelloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. SchriberOregon Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  3. Perkins v. Arkansas Trucking Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. LudlumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. TewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API