Legal Opinion

State v. Ludlum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 1981No. 75PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether testimony by a four-year-old girl that defendant “touched me . . . with his tongue . . . between my legs” while indicating the place of touching to the jury constitutes sufficient evidence of “cunnilingus” to support a conviction for a first-degree sexual offense. We hold that it does.

To convict a defendant of a first-degree sexual offense with a child of twelve years or less, the State need only prove (1) the defendant engaged in a “sexual act,” (2) the victim was at the time of the act twelve years old or less, and (3)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. HigginbottomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API