State v. Ludlum
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The principal question presented by this appeal is whether testimony by a four-year-old girl that defendant “touched me . . . with his tongue . . . between my legs” while indicating the place of touching to the jury constitutes sufficient evidence of “cunnilingus” to support a conviction for a first-degree sexual offense. We hold that it does.
To convict a defendant of a first-degree sexual offense with a child of twelve years or less, the State need only prove (1) the defendant engaged in a “sexual act,” (2) the victim was at the time of the act twelve years old or less, and (3)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HigginbottomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.