Legal Opinion

Black v. Littlejohn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 30, 1985No. 196A84PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

On 1 October 1978, defendant, a licensed physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, performed surgery on plaintiff. The surgical procedures performed included a total abdominal hysterectomy, a bilateral salpingo oophorectomy, appendectomy and lysis of adhesions. Defendant prescribed and performed the surgery for plaintiff to alleviate and resolve a certain condition diagnosed by defendant as endometriosis. Plaintiff, in her af fidavit, stated that defendant told her “he had done everything he could to avoid a hysterectomy and that nothing else would work.” On 17 August…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Florence B. Corcoran Wife Of/and Wayne D. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bryant v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API