Legal Opinion
Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 25, 1993No. 91-C-1240, 92-C-214PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, Senior District Judge.
Now before the Court is the motion of defendant-counterplaintiff Paliafito 1 pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order granting leave to file its “Second Amended Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint.” For the following reasons, Paliafito’s motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts underlying this dispute are (already) complex. (See Order of December 1, 1992, 828 F.Supp. 1301, 1305-54.) For purposes of the motion now before the Court, however, only the following procedural history, as set out in greater detail in the Civil Docket,…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- Campania Management Company, Incorporated v. Rooks, Pitts & Poust, a Law Firm, and Frank Rowland, Rooks, Pitts & Poust, a Law Firm v. Campania Management Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Saxholm AS v. Dynal, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Campania Management Co. v. Rooks, Pitts & PoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Acme Printing Ink Co. v. Menard, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.