Legal Opinion
Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & Burrill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1987No. 86-6546PublishedCited by 1,254 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal comes from the Central District of California where the court denied a motion for leave to submit a fourth amended complaint. Appellants seek to amend their complaint to add appellee, the law firm of Hill, Farrer & Burrill, as a defendant to the suit.
I
This case was brought by a number of limited partnerships seeking damages from numerous individual and corporate defendants. Hill, Farrer & Burrill (HFB), was not named as a defendant in the original complaint. The original complaint alleged violations of both federal and state securities laws. More…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,254 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
1,249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.